Która (forma zakazanego zainteresowania) to neshech, a która to tarbith? Który to Neshech? Pożyczenie sela (cztery dinary) za pięć dinarów; dwie sa'ah pszenicy za trzy (zwane „neszek”), ponieważ „gryzie” (noshech), [biorąc od niego to, czego mu nie dał]. A co to jest tarbit? Zwiększanie [zysku dla siebie] poprzez produkcję. [I zarówno w pożyczaniu pieniędzy, jak i pożyczaniu produktów istnieje ribith (wzrost), ponieważ jego pieniądze rosną, ale druga część (Miszny) traktuje ribith przez rozporządzenie rabiniczne, kupując i sprzedając.] Jak to? Gdyby kupił od niego pszenicę za złotego dinara [dwadzieścia pięć srebrnych dinarów] za korona (pszenicy), a taka byłaby cena rynkowa [(i wolno mu teraz dawać pieniądze, aby otrzymywać od niego pszenicę przez cały rok) po tej cenie w zależności od ilości pieniędzy, którą mu dał, chociaż w tej chwili nie ma pszenicy. Jak się dowiedzieliśmy (5: 7): „Gdyby ogłoszono cenę rynkową, mogą dokonać transakcji (na tej podstawie). nawet jeśli on (sprzedawca) może nie mieć (produktu), inny ma "i sprzedawca może go teraz kupić po tej cenie)]— Gdyby mu powiedział: „Daj mi mą pszenicę, bo chcę ją sprzedać i kupić za nią wino”, a on (sprzedawca) powiedział do niego: „Przyjmuję twoją pszenicę za trzydzieści dinarów (korowi) i Dam ci za to wino " —Jeśli nie ma wina (to jest ribith). [Jest dozwolone, jeśli on (sprzedawca) dał mu pszenicę, ale jeśli zawarł transakcję, aby dać mu za to wino, a nie ma wina, jest to zabronione, aby cena wina nie wzrosła. I nawet jeśli zawrze z nim transakcję według aktualnej, ogłoszonej ceny rynkowej, ponieważ on (kupujący) nie daje mu pieniędzy, w takim przypadku możemy powiedzieć, że on (sprzedawca) może kupić wino (teraz) za pieniądze, które Odebrane; ale on (sprzedawca) przyszedł wziąć na siebie cenę pszenicy jako dług i przelać ją na dług winny—jeśli nie ma wina, jest to zabronione. Gdyby bowiem miał wino, zostałoby natychmiast nabyte przez tego (kupującego), wino zostało określone jako spłata długu, a gdyby cena wina wzrosła, uczyniłaby to w jego domenie.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Metzia
איזהו נשך שהוא נושך – that he took from him what he (i.e., the other) didn’t give him.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Metzia
Introduction
The fifth chapter of Bava Metziah deals with the Torah’s prohibition of lending money to another Jew with interest. Leviticus 25:35-37 states (JPS translation): “If your kinsman, being in straits, comes under your authority, and you hold him as though a resident alien, let him live by your side. Do not exact from him advance (neshech) or accrued interest (tarbit), but fear your God. Let him live by your side as a your kinsman. Do not lend him your money at advance interest (neshech), or give him your food at accrued interest (tarbit).”
Our mishnah deals with the Rabbinic definitions of “neshech” and “tarbit”.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Metzia
המרבה בפירות – he increases the reward for himself with produce, and whether by the loan of money or whether by the loan of produce it is interest, for he increases his money. But the concluding part of the Mishnah deals with Rabbinic interest, as it explains – which through the means of commercial transactions.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Metzia
What is usury ( and what is increase (? It is usury ( when a man lends a sela for five dinars, or two seahs of wheat for three, because he bites ( [off too much]. Section one defines “neshech”. This is a simple form of loaning with interest, where a person gives another person a loan of either money or goods and expects to get back more in return. The mishnah understands that the Biblical word “neshech” derives from the word “noshech” which means to bite. Interest “bites” because the creditor bites off from the debtor more than he gave.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Metzia
דינר זהב – twenty-five silver denars.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Bava Metzia
And what is increase? When a man increases [his gains] by [selling] produce. How is this so? (1) [If] one bought wheat at a golden dinars [=25 silver dinars] for a kor when such was the market price, and then wheat rose to thirty [silver] dinars [per kor]. (2) [If] he said to him, “Give me my wheat since I would sell it and buy wine with the proceeds” and the other said, “Let your wheat be reckoned with me at thirty dinars and you now have a claim on me for wine [to that value], although the creditor has no wine. Section two defines the word “tarbit”. This situation is more complicated. Reuven buys from Shimon wheat at 25 dinars (=one silver dinars) per kor (a unit of volume) which was the market price of wheat. Shimon does not immediately provide the wheat but rather will provide it at a later time. After the sale the market price of wheat rises to 30 dinars. Reuven requests from Shimon his wheat so that he can sell the wheat and buy wine. Reuven is allowed to purchase the wheat at the lower price since he bought it at what was at the time market value. Shimon says to Reuven that he will sell him wine in return for the wheat that he owes him. In other words Shimon promises to provide Reuven with 30 dinars worth of wine, since that is the current value of the wheat. If Shimon does not currently have this wine in his possession this is forbidden. The reason is that if the price of wine goes up Reuven will have in effect loaned Shimon 30 dinars (the amount of wheat that Shimon owes Reuven) and when he gets the wine that has gone up in price he will receive back more than he loaned. If Shimon had had the wine at the time when he said this to Reuven it would have been permitted, since by trading his wheat for wine, the wine would be in Reuven’s possession when it rose in price. The problem is that if Shimon doesn’t own the wine he is in essence borrowing Reuven’s money. If the price of wine should rise Shimon will end up returning interest to Reuven.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Metzia
וכן השער – Such is how they were sold in the city, and it was permissible for him to give money now on the condition that he would give him the wheat all the days of the year with these monies according to the monetary rate, and even though that he doesn’t have the wheat right now. It is taught [in the Mishnah] of our chapter (Mishnah 7):, “when the market price is out, you may purchase, for although he (i.e., the seller) has not goods as yet, others have,” and this seller can purchase them now with these monies.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Metzia
עמדו חטין בשלשים דינרים אמר לו תן לי חיטי – and this is permissible, if he gives him the wheat, but if he fixed a price to give him for them wine, it is prohibited, lest the wine become more expensive, for since he doesn’t have any wine. And even though he fixed a price with him according to the current market price of wine, and the market price had gone out. For since he doesn’t give him money that we would be able to say that he could purchase wine with these monies tha the received, but he makes the value of the wheat an obligation and to set a price on his obligation of wine, this is prohibited if he lacks wine. For if he had wine, it would be purchased to him from now to the person who comes to set a price on the obligation of wine, and when it went up in price, it was in his possession when it went up in price.
